Three Reasons Why Khan's and Britain's New Approach to Terrorism is Both Illogical and Illegal

Incredible. Just after another major terrorist attack in Britain, instead of identifying radical Islam as the most obvious and imminent threat to their citizenry, London Mayor Sadiq Khan has outlined that he will focus on a task force that is intent upon imprisoning anyone that questions radical Islamic terrorist actions online for "hate crimes" causing "depression" and other reactions from "victims" of criticism.

 Breitbart outlines: The measures will be “delivered in partnership with social media providers” who along with “specialist officers” will be “filtering and identification of online hate crimes” and “identifying the location of the crime and allocating to the appropriate force…” It's official now in Britain: The terrorists are the victims, and the victims that complain are the terrorists. Kahn's law criminalizes “using [a] public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety,” The punishment can be a six-month prison term or fine of up to £5,000. 1,209 Brits were recently found guilt of this 'hate creime' law. 
 
Great Britain's "Online Hate Crime Hub" outlines how "specialist officers" will be broadly supported, and it reminds one of the Nazi SS Officers or Soviet KGB thought crime police that could arrest and imprison any citizen at any time for any criticism that they interpret as hateful.  In addition to being ripe for abuse, there are at least three other reasons why this approach is both illogical and illegal:
      

Three Reasons Why Khan's and Britain's New Approach to Terrorism is Both Illogical and Illegal

    

1. The reason why terrorists perform terrorism is that they believe that their actions will produce results in their interest. So in capitulating to terrorist wishes for more Islamic control over society in London after a major terrorist attack, Sadiq Khan is actually encouraging more terrorism. 

2. The basic right to life is obviously a more fundamental right than a claimed right not to be offended by perceived hate speech. By forbidding any criticism of terrorism committed by Islamic extremists on the Internet, Khan and his political task force are engaging in an egregious reversal of basic human rights. 

3. Sadiq Khan is opposing both the letter and spirit of the law in the The Constitution of Great Britain: Article 1 "We the people, on the basis of equality, liberty and democracy, founded the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on this land." When one minority group is given favoritism to takeover the country with their private Shariah law, this is diametrically opposed to "the basis of equality" and "liberty" and "democracy," displaying plainly that Khan and his task force are operating outside of the law. Great Britain presently has 85 Shariah courts operating against the mandate of the constitution. Theresa May, Sadiq Khan, and any other politician that allows this is by definition acting in a lawless manner. The real criminals, in this case, are not those voicing criticism on the Internet but, rather, those actively opposing the constitution of The United Kingdom.

The combined effect of encouraging the Islamic takeover of Great Britain and the suppression of free speech represents nothing less than an all out war against the personal rights and freedoms of Great Britain's citizenry. And this approach has been seen throughout the western European Union. Poland is one of the few countries where leaders are pointing out the serious resulting long-term problems of EU Muslim immigration rules. Poland is correct. Muslims do not generally want to assimilate, but to dominate. And The EU is committing cultural suicide.

PC Officers are the new SS Officers in the NWO global war against freedom. Khan has been critical of Donald Trump. But Trump was elected based upon an understandable desire to protect basic civil freedoms that of late have been increasingly undermined by political correctness run amok. Kahn may be more inclined to identify with Barack Obama because, like Kahn, there are at least five examples of how Obama usurped the U.S. Constitution. 

    

The real problem is not free speech, but a failure to acknowledge that Muslims in general do not assimilate into other cultures. In contrast to Mayor Khan's desire for totalitarian and unwarranted suppression of free speech in England, Wikipedia is (so far) not forbidden to actually label and outline a "List of Islamic Terrorist Attacks" as specifically "Islamic," and listing how many people have been killed and wounded so far in Great Britain. In 2017 alone there have been three major Islamic terrorist attacks in Great Britain. Wikipedia for some reason has left out the March 22 Westminster attack from their "List of Islamist terrorist attacks." 

1. 2017, 22 March: 2017 Westminster attack - 6 killed 49 injured.

2. 2017, 22 May: 2017 Manchester Arena bombing - 22 killed 129 injured.

3. 2017, 3 June: 2017 London Attack - 7 killed 48 injured.
 
This is George Orwell's worst nightmare of 1984 becoming an ever-increasing reality, where the terrorists are the victims and the victims that complain are the terrorists. Terrorism is evil. Islam produces exponentially more terrorism than any other religion or source. To outlaw the identification of these two facts as criminal, and to claim that trying to address this problem is a "hate crime" is morally and ethically bankrupt, and reprehensible. Theresa May and Sadiq Khan, and all politicians in support of these actions are promoting illegal and unconstitutional lawlessness. Politically correct totalitarianism and Islamo-Leftism are increasingly on display in France, and the EU at large. PC Officers are the new SS Officers in the NWO global war against freedom.

In reality, it's good to address the problem of terrorism objectively and to implement practical and logical solutions, not to forbitd it. Isaiah 5:20 offers: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter." (NIV). And this is precisely what these laws are proposing: exchanging evil for good and good for evil.

There is a lot of talk about finalizing BREXIT. The subject of BREXIT is moot if the UK becomes completely usurped by Shariah Law. There is no chance of freedom and democracy in that case.


 
Message to Theresa May and Sadiq Khan:

Instead of screening text of UK facebook posts for alleged "hate crimes" against UK Muslims by concerned citizens, why don't you screen your UK Constitution for text of "freedom" and "democracy," stop capitulating to terrorists, and stop enabling Sharia Law as against your own laws and your own general population? True freedom of speech means no PC thought crimes or PC authoritarianism.

Tags: Britain's new hate speech censorship laws, thought crimes in Britain, in partnership with social media providers, Khan's new Internet hate crime laws, Britain's new Internet hate crime laws, Theresa May and Sadiq Khan illegal unconstitutional lawlessness, United Kingdom free speech censorship, BREXIT made moot by Shariah takeover of UK