March 04, 2012

Bill Gates: Dystopian Philanthropy and Neo-eugenics

Bill Gates seems like Mr. Softy with his big smile, kind face, and gentle demeanor, and so a lot of people were surprised when he advocated the use of "death panels" to help US hospitals kill elderly people with euthanasia measures in order to save money.[1] The comment, made on July 8, 2010, at the Aspen Ideas Festival, was based on an 'end justifies the means' type of rationale, wherein money saved by euthanasia could be used to help pay teacher salaries. While Dr. Mengele and Dr. Kavorkian would probably be proud of Mr. Gates, the rest of us should probably try to keep abreast of what he's up to. When you examine the types of projects Gates is involved in, frankly, it's scary. From GMO agriculture to vaccines, Gates' activities have earned him the nickname of Mr. Micro Softkill, along with a Facebook page for the namesake.[2]

The word philanthropy is usually associated with helping people. But Gates' philanthropy combines a longing to decrease the population, a lust for innovation, and a lack of basic human autonomy with regard to ethics, all working together to various degrees with unaccountable globalist organizations such as the United Nations. This is the perfect recipe for dystopia. If this generation could be described as an ethically illiterate one, Bill Gates would be one of the prime examples. In 2009, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett spoke to Columbia University students in a forum about business corruption and the economic crisis, and it seems all Gates could talk about was business "success" and "failure"[3] Between the two of them they had nothing in the way of specific ethical advice or guidance to offer. It was a bit perplexing considering the title of the event. Perhaps due to their vast wealth and independence, they do not believe that there is any need for them to understand ethical issues.

Gates and Buffet are considered the second and third richest men in the world in 2012. These and other billionaire globalists make their plans behind closed doors completely uninterested in public input or public opinion regarding their schemes. For example, in 2009 Bill Gates, George Soros, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller and Ted Turner (calling themselves "The Good Club") joined in a secret meeting in NYC to discuss the main agenda of population reduction.[4] Gates' and Buffets' heirloom seed hoarding and promotion of UN global genetically modified food programs give cause for concern because GM foods not only cause infertility and sickness, they also ravage the earth. There's plenty of evidence to show that elites such as Bill Gates avoid GMO foods for themselves and their families while promoting them for others. And there is recurring evidence that shows a correlation between excessive vaccines and such problems as Autism, This was shown in a study comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated American homeschooled children. Vaccinated children were over four-fold more likely to be diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum (OR 4.3).

On at least two public occasions, Gates has proposed that he would lower the world's population with the help of new vaccine campaigns in third world countries. The first was Bill and TED's excellent adventure in 2010, a presentation wherein Gates stated, "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."[5] The second occasion was MD Sanjay Gupta's interview on CNN in 2011, wherein he stated vaccines help in "reducing population growth"..[6] Gates' logic? When children are healthy, the mothers in poorer countries will not sense a need to bear more children in order to overcome the high casualty statistics.

There could be a case for this argument if vaccines used in third world countries by the UN and other globalist NGOs were shown to be of a decent quality, if vaccines had not been used as stealth fertility measures and if the vaccine campaigns were offered to people on a voluntary choice basis with no pressure. However, documented examples show the opposite to be true.

Vaccine quality, quantity, and timing

Limited vaccine use will definitely help to save lives when used appropriately, however, they are often used recklessly. A report by US News 7 in 2011 revealed that mercury is still found in 11 US vaccines.[7] US vaccines for the flue, tetanus and boosters, meningococcal, diptheria-tetanus combinations, among others, have been shown to contain Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative which many doctors consider to be harmful.

During the previously noted interview with Sanjay Gupta, Gates stated the correlation between vaccines and autism was an "absolute lie" but statistics show there is, in fact, a correlation. The Death by Vaccination website shows the statics of autism are 10-20 times higher in the US where vaccines are used at three times the rate of other developed countries.[8] Also, American children are vaccinated at the worst possible time, thus increasing the risk of autism.

US Health Resources Services Administration [HRSA] has stated to CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkission, "We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures.”[9] Secondly, poor children in poor nations frequently receive cheaper vaccines, which may contain comparatively large quantities of mercury or aluminum.[10]  Thirdly, Natural News reported how loads of outdated flu vaccines found their way to Africa. The had WHO declared that the flu pandemic had ended on 10 August 2010, and Africa was relatively untouched by the flu pandemic. But, nevertheless, but the late and unnecessary vaccine campaign in Africa was promoted to the end of August.[11] In order for Bill Gates to reach his desired population reduction statistics, it may be necessary for him to adopt the practices of his good friend David Rockefeller.

F. William Engdahl outlined how David Rockefeller helped to develop a new vaccine in conjunction with the World Health Organization (WHO) as early as 1972.[12] The massive vaccination campaigns were presented as helpful solutions to fight diseases but, in reality, the main purpose was to create infertility in women in countries such as Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. Is it possible that the sterilization and induced abortion aspect of these vaccines were accidental? Dr. Leonard Coldwell has outlined some key facts that would imply that it is highly unlikely that these sterilization techniques could have been accidental:

The Known Facts

Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:

* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren’t men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?

* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there — in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been “contaminated.”

* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?

* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier — the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.[13]

What if children and families do not want to participate in certain UN vaccination programs? According to the Malawi Voice news, 131 children from Nsanje were forced to take 'humanitarian' vaccines at gunpoint.[14] The vaccine campaign slogan may have been "Take a shot or get shot, your choice." In a short video of Malawi starring Melinda Gates at the Gates' und website, Melinda states Malawi is one of the few countries "on track" for the UN Millenium Development Goal.[15] The UN Millenium Declaration asserts that every individual has the right to dignity, freedom and equality, but if forced vaccines at gunpoint are considered "on track" with the plan, then I would hate to see what the full maturity of these goals will look like.

Is Gates' world a utopia or a dystopia?

Gates seems to truly believe he is helping the world. But, in reality, it seems he is helping to create a cold and harsh dystopia. Gates promotes poisonous GE foods, totalitarian vaccination programs, weather manipulation and other threatening projects, while at the same time he seems to have no ethical foundation and no accountability. Bill Gates and Agenda 21 seem to be a trend of the present and future.

Are these billionaire globalists really philanthropists or are they misanthropists? Personally, I believe the combined documented facts reveal the latter. 'Billanthropy' is really 'killanthropy', or so it seems. Even though the rest of us may desire natural foods and natural techniques, it seems the Gates, Rockefellers and Buffets of the world will continue to use their money and influence to attempt to do things their way. The future of the planet has been outlined in scripture. Though things will likely get a lot worse before they get better, truth and love will eventually prevail despite the vain schemes of vain men. The promised land was described as a land flowing with milk and honey. Our dystopian world features cancer inducing hormonal milk and bee colony collapse disorder likely helped along by the massive pesticide usage in GE crops. True paradise is ultimately found not in a place but in a person. Jesus Christ.said "Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent." as outlined in John 17.3.

References

[1] Bill Gates Wants Death Panels: Dying People VS Teachers , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwB6WY9qhuE&feature=player_embedded
[2] Facebook page, Bill Gates as Mr. Micro-softkill, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bill-Gates-Mr-Micro-Softkill/144159108993247
[3] YouTube, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates On The Economic Crisis and Ethics , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTFmUuJlTZY 
[4] The Guardian, What is The Good Club and Who Are The Globalists That Attend, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/31/new-york-billionaire-philanthropists
[5]  Youtube, Bill Gates wants a Billion Dead! Vaccines and Health Care will do the Job!, Gates' TED presentation, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUJMR3BUm2s
[6] Bill gates promotes population control on CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syHdzFVaSz8&feature=player_embedded
[7] Natural News, The Dangers of Vaccines (Autism MMR HPV Gardasil Swine Flu H1N1 Thimerosal), http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=2983BF1AD305321A5DCFA5C53419DCBA, original source, Channel 7 report, Mercury Still in 1 Vaccines,
[8] Death by Vaccination, WE FOUND THE MISSING AUTISM PUZZLE PIECE, http://deathbyvaccination.com/
[9] Child Health Safety, MMR Causes Autism – Another Win In US Federal Court, http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/juliawinsmmrcase/
[10] NAFWA, New Revelation - The Neurotoxin Far Worse than Mercury..., http://www.nafwa.org/general-nutrition/alternative-nutrition/33179-new-revelation-the-neurotoxin-far-worse-than-mercury.html
[11] Natural News, Swine Flu Vaccines Dumped in Africa, http://www.naturalnews.com/029742_vaccines_swine_flu.html
[12] Oil Geopolitics, Bill Gates talks about‘vaccines to reduce the population, http://oilgeopolitics.net/Swine_Flu/Gates_Vaccines/gates_vaccines.html
[13] Dr. Leonard Coldwell, Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth-Control Drugs? http://drleonardcoldwell.com/2010/09/21/are-new-vaccines-laced-with-birth-control-drugs/
[14] Activist Post, Gates Foundation Partner in Malawi Vaccinates 131 Children At Gunpoint, http://www.activistpost.com/2011/07/gates-foundation-partner-in-malawi.html
[15] Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Melinda Gates on Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health in Malawi, http://www.gatesfoundation.org/maternalnewbornandchildhealth/Pages/melinda-french-gates-malawi-slideshow.aspx

Search terms: Mr. Softy, Mister Softie, Bill Gates' eugenics, world's richest men, Bill Gates and depopulation, Bill Gates and euthanasia, UN vaccination sterilization, ethical illiteracy, Gates - Monsanto connection, What is a dystopia? Gates Rockefeller Buffet Monsanto connection, Bill Gates Agenda 21, examples of neo-eugenics, means to an end ethics, Bill Gates ethics, Birth control Bill Gates, Bill Gates genocide in Africa

(Revised 03/05/12)

Related:

Gates and Rockefeller Cafeterias Reject Monsanto GE Foods!

Logical Reasons why Moral Relativism is False

How Richard Dawkins' Evolution Justifies Racism and Genocide

11 comments:

  1. Uhu... Very convincing criticism from a person, who considers good people who do not believe in God should burn in hell for eternity

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous,

    You had written that you consider the Georgia Guide Stones and the plan to reduce the word's population down to 500,000,000, "wise":

    "I have heard of the Georgia Guidestone, but how on earth does it point at a secret society? Frankly speaking, I find these commandements very rational and wise. Though, I still consider it a mistake to put them in such a form. Since people are stupid, some already see in this monument a call towards mass genocide and the establishment of an authoritarian regime with eugenics."

    Aug 18, 2011 09:33 AM

    http://templestream.blogspot.com/2011/08/atheism-and-chinese-dead-baby-pills-any.html

    Many people are on record as supporting a massive genocide of innocent people and, ironically, the same people will often say that God is unfair.

    If you would be sincerely willing to compare what you consider to be good (people you mentioned such as Mahatma Gandhi) with the holiness of God, as represented in the life of Jesus Christ, then you would understand that no one can really be good or righteous without God.

    The fact is, everyone has a dark side and only God can redeem it. Your example, Mahatma Gandhi, was considered a pedaphile by people who knew him closely because he frequently slept with multiple young women.

    http://rupeenews.com/2007/12/six-stories-of-mohandas-gandhi-his-failures-sexual-perversion/

    You know you have a dark side as well, your conscience has told you so. But you are unwilling to admit it, it seems or you don't consider it 'so bad' it seems.

    ReplyDelete
  3. R:Many people are on record as supporting a massive genocide of innocent people and, ironically, the same people will often say that God is unfair.

    Uhu... Like the Christians Luther and Hitler...

    R:You had written that you consider the Georgia Guide Stones and the plan to reduce the word's population down to 500,000,000, "wise"

    And I still stand by my words. I agree with the spirit of the Georgia Guide Stone even if I disagree with its format. The only thing that can be subjected to a discussion, is the optional number of people on the globe.

    R:If you would be sincerely willing to compare what you consider to be good (people you mentioned such as Mahatma Gandhi) with the holiness of God, as represented in the life of Jesus Christ, then you would understand that no one can really be good or righteous without God.

    I do not care about Jesus and other legends. I am interested what YOU yourself consider good...

    Do you seriously believe that a child deserves eternal suffering for not believing in God? Do honestly think that there are no loving and caring non-christian people and humanity deserves to be send to hell? Are you ok with that?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rick's on trial here! And from a doofus that starts by trying to poison the well.
    Anon2

    ReplyDelete
  5. >And I still stand by my words. I agree with the spirit of the Georgia Guide Stone even if I disagree with its format.

    - So, 'God is unfair' for righteously judging sin, but 6 billion innocent people can be eliminated from the Earth just so because an elite group believes it is necessary. Your logic is off and your ethics are twisted.

    I had made a point you did not address:

    You know you have a dark side as well, your conscience has told you so. But you are unwilling to admit it, or you don't consider it 'so bad' it seems.

    - Would you deny that you have a dark side? Do you really believe you are a good person through and through?

    >I do not care about Jesus and other legends.

    - Atheists who study history will admit that Jesus was an historical person.

    >I am interested what YOU yourself consider good...

    - Jesus is good.

    >Do you seriously believe that a child deserves eternal suffering for not believing in God?

    - No, children are not judged in this manner according to most interpretations of scripture because they are too young to be aware of the critical issues and their implications.

    You, however, seem to be in denial of your sin nature, your conscience which reveals it and your need for addressing your sins.

    ReplyDelete
  6. R:So, 'God is unfair' for righteously judging sin, but 6 billion innocent people can be eliminated from the Earth just so because an elite group believes it is necessary. Your logic is off and your ethics are twisted.

    Ok... Our planet has limited resources. Hence, it cannot sustain an unlimited amount of human beings, we did learn this the hard way with Africa and some ancient civilizations. Therefore, we should control the number of our population to avoid a tragedy. What part of my reasoning is faulty and immoral? What is so immoral about birth control?

    R:Would you deny that you have a dark side? Do you really believe you are a good person through and through?

    I know I am not perfect. But I certainly do not deserve eternal damnation and I doubt that anyone close to me would disagree.

    R:Atheists who study history will admit that Jesus was an historical person.

    Just like Robin Hood or King Arthur

    R:Jesus is good.

    And everyone else is bad and deserve to be tortured for eternity? Is he the only good person you can think of?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rick, you've never met a NWO conspiracy you've not liked, have you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, Alex, you don't believe Agenda 21 exists as a verifiable agenda? - You don't believe influential people such as Gates and Rockefeller are working together with the UN in order to reduce the world's population with no accountability to nation-states whatsoever?

      Delete
    2. Evidence (reputable evidence, not the fear mongery you seem to love) would be a good thing Rick.

      Delete
  8. Only a small number of irrational crazies believe that. Careful with the lizard people 8)

    ReplyDelete
  9. More ignorant ranting from our host.

    Apparently bringing up the topic of assisted dying (which is about all Gates seemed to be doing) is akin to advocating genocide.

    And this from a person who worships a slavery loving, misogynistic, genocidal being who has the power to make everything "good", but simply can't be bothered doing so. God loves suffering, and apparently so will we if/when we end up in heaven.

    Rick, your God is an evil, petty little thing!

    ReplyDelete

You are welcome to post on-topic comments but, please, no uncivilized blog abuse or spamming. Thank you!