Richard Dawkins' basic attitude towards
On the Origin of Species seems to be, 'It's a groundbreaking and immensity important book ...but, well, the introduction and conclusion should be completely ignored!" If you attended a secular school and experienced a secular higher education, you probably don't know what is in the introduction and conclusion. If your education was basically secular, you probably never heard that Darwin was not an atheist and he believed the origin of life most likely had a divine origin.
What is striking is that Richard Dawkins in his book,
The God Delusion, denies basic knowledge of Darwin's beliefs on these subjects. Why is this striking? Because Dawkins has labelled his professional career position as an "evolutionary biologist" and it would seem likely that at some point Dawkins probably read
The Origin of Species. It may be that Dawkins may be in a state of denial and he does not realize what he has read. By comparing Darwins' actually writings with Dawkins' statements about Darwin, it's possible to examine the discrepancies and offer possible reasons for them.