FBI IG Report: Obama Lied, Comey let Hillary off, and the Clinton "Crime Against Children"

It's interesting to me that the Inspector General's Report released yesterday shows that OBAMA LIED about whether he knew Hillary Clinton was using a private email account for sensitive emails and yet "Trump is lying" is trending in the FAKE NEWS networks. The conclusion of the Inspector General's report offers that there was no influential 'political bias' by the FBI investigation of the 2016 election, however, that conclusion is absurd when details are reviewed.

Obama Lied and 13 supported criminal activity, not to mention the FBI's support. The Inspector General's report states that "President Barack Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account." Not only does the report show Obama was lying when he said he was not aware of this, it shows that key FBI officials ignored crimes because they were committed to keeping Trump out of the White House, as confirmed when lead FBI agent on the Clinton investigation, Peter Strzok, told his colleague who asked him if Trump would win: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it,”. The fact that a total of 13 government employees, and the FBI, were aware that Hillary Clinton was illegally using a personal email system for classified information and said nothing at a minimum shows extreme political bias because, like Obama, these were individuals also supporting her presidential run and expecting that she would be the next president. Hillary did not only use a private email account, but she had a private computer server at home to store data and the implication is that she wanted to be able to destroy data whenever she chose to. The fact that the FBI was aware of many aspects of criminal activity and did nothing not only implicates them as biased but because this also relates to a serious crime that undermined national security, the FBI was complicit in criminal activity. It seems the real motive was that too many people on "their side" were supporting criminal activity and to expose this would implicate not only multiple democrats but the FBI itself. The IG report on the FBI underscores that a special counsel or a Grand Jury should be convened to root out the documented widespread and serious criminal corruption within the FBI and the government in general. Either Bill Clinton or Loretta Lynch Lied The Washington Examiner documents how Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch gave extremely conflicting accounts of how and why they met privately on the airport runway tarmac. This detail in the IG report implies that one of them was lying. Because the descriptions are so different, they both cannot be true. Why would they lie about their meeting? Perhaps because Lynch was supposed to be overseeing the Hillary Clinton email case without bias and that meeting was patently unacceptable in and of itself. Any legal professional should know that.
Comey let Hillary off The report also confirms that Comey's investigation of Hillary Clinton was against protocol and not acceptable. Inspector General Michael Horowitz stated Comey's actions were "extraordinary and insubordinate," and without excuse for deviating from "well-established Department policies." The fact that this was not a slip-up but a radical breach from protocol does not imply negligence but a determined intention to let Hillary Clinton off the hook, and Comey's evoking the “intent” defense of Clinton additionally underscores a premeditated effort to protect Clinton from what constitutes a felony, not to mention that Hillary's apparent election fraud is a felony that carries a potential10-year prison sentence.

Transcripts of a Senate investigation presented by Chuck Grassley show that Comey had made his decision to exonerate Hillary Clinton prior to interviews of key witnesses and months before the investigation had ended: "Conclusion first, fact-gathering second -- that's no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy," It's important to remember that the crime of using a private server for classified emails is a felony regardless of intent. In other words, Hillary's defense of "Oops, I messed up" does not cut it and she should have been prosecuted. The bias in this investigation in favor of Hillary Clinton is coincidental with a lack of any serious FBI investigation and prosecution with regard to the documented election fraud by the Clinton presidential campaign that was victorious over Bernie Sanders. Clinton Foundation "Crime Against Children" The heavily redacted FBI report also shows the subject of "Crime Against Children" directly under the heading "Hillary Clinton and Foundation" but does not explain what this is referring to. Even left-leaning Politico affirmed that Hillary Clinton was helping to enable Bill Clinton by covering up his alleged sexual assaults. A report from 2016 showed flight logs wherein Bill Clinton flew at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” of registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's proven crime was that of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. Both the plane and Epstein's private resort were apparently used for illegal sex with under-aged girls. One witness, Virginia Roberts, claims that she was a "sex slave" for Epstein and that she saw Bill Clinton at Epstein's Island where she typically had sex with “powerful men, including politicians and business executives.” The records show that Bill Clinton asked his government security detail to leave him alone for private matters during these trips. Monica Petersen's biography describes how she was a courageous and dedicated worker determined to stop child sex trafficking and not afraid to stand up to any person or institution in order to fight corruption. As she was working in an organization dedicated to ending child sex trafficking, she was in Haiti where this is a serious problem and where the Clinton Foundation was heavily involved. Petersen's Facebook posts link to The Haitian Blogger underscored how Monica was very critical of the Clinton Foundation and the apparent deep corruption of the Clintons. Monica's death on November 13, 2016, was ruled a suicide, though there was apparently no autopsy and though her mother and co-workers did not believe this. We may never know what really happened to her, but the public deserves to know what the "Crime Against Children" under the "Hillary Clinton and Foundation" title noted in the Inspector General's report refers to. The "SpyGate" crimes that the IG report does not cover are perhaps more disturbing Documents have been produced that show clear directives from President Barack Obama to spy on Donald Trump. The "Spygate" controversy has been proven to be true. A document dated November 17, 2016, titled as "Top Secret" requests intelligence operatives from a foreign country to not only spy on Donald Trump as a civilian but also after his election to the presidency. The letter from the Government Communications Headquarters of England outlines, "US National Security Adviser Rice has requested that we continue our surveillance, during the transition period, as internal US intelligence is potentially compromised by the incoming Trump administration." The ACLU affirms that spying on U.S. citizens is illegal. When the FBI wants to wiretap a domestic suspect, it is required to go to court for a warrant. The Watergate scandal was based on Republican Party supporters planting a recording device in Democrat Party headquarters. It was illegal then and it is now. Because this spying by President Obama was ongoing, it is more serious than Watergate. USA Today outlines the extreme threat this type of criminal activity and corruption is to the republic: "It now seems apparent that we overestimated the patriotism and professionalism of the people in these agencies, who allowed them to be politically weaponized by the Obama administration. That being true, if we value democracy, can we permit them to exist in their current form? That’s a decision that President Trump and Congress will have to face. Ironically, they may be afraid to — for fear that intelligence agencies will engage in further targeted political leaks." Serious FBI Corruption and the need for a special counsel or Grand Jury A special counsel or a Grand Jury would be the logical response for such serious crimes that not only are defined as felonies deserving prison time but the level to which this threatened national security is incredible. Donald Trump was spot on in claiming there is serious FBI corruption. Fox News outlines how the IG report of the FBI affirms the "Spygate" scandal worse than Watergate because it was routine and continuous: "Along with the FBI's cozy relationship with the media, Horowitz's report charges that officials in the bureau at "all levels of the organization" leaked information to reporters without authorization." At "all levels of the organization" the FBI leaked sensitive information to reporters without authorization in exchange for gifts: "We identified instances where FBI employees improperly received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic social events," Not only was this apparent bribery politically biased, it was criminal activity and threatened national security. The publisher and executive editor of the NY Times actually felt the need to rededicate their newspaper to honesty after their biased election coverage. The NY Times stated Nov. 13, 2016, "As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly," Heads should roll over this FBI bribery and the many crimes implicated in the IG report. A Grand Jury is required for serious crimes according to the Constitution: The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger;" Those that compromised sensitive information on private unsecured computers, those that intentionally leaked sensitive information to the public without oversight, and those that lied about these activities in order to cover them up all broke the law and also threatened national security and these serious crimes should be addressed by a Grand Jury. The Wall Street Journal explained the rogue nature of the FBI document blackout. Redactions should only occur for reasons of national security, but in this case, the FBI is censoring information from Congress and from oversight in order to cover themselves. And this begs the question: Who is going to investigate this 'bureau of investigation' and hold them accountable when there is clear evidence that they have gone rogue? Dinesh D'Souza made a good point: "Criminals with badges are more dangerous than other criminals because they don’t just violate the law, they corrupt it." If we are supposed to take the investigation conclusion as, "Move along, there's nothing to see here." then this implies that there is not only a two-tier justice system in the US where elite politicians and government agents are held to a very different standard than non-government citizens, it also implies that the US is being run by a completely unaccountable shadow government. The FBI claimed that a "lack of public interest" in getting to the bottom of the Clinton Email Scandal somehow justified their negligence, but legal accountability is not based on popular opinion. While Judicial Watch created a petition to encourage government accountability, this IG report on the FBI outlines enough evidence to convene a Grand Jury for the corruption that is much worse than had been previously documented. Many people and organizations are risking their lives to investigate and bring to light the widespread corruption, however, as Matt Couch pointed out there aren't many outlets or authorities that are not either complacent or corrupted. If you want true news and updates on important facts, you cannot rely on the mainstream news but it does help to follow others. Consider that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposed a drone strike on Julian Assange in order to stop information on corruption from coming out. If anyone believes that the Inspector General's report was not a complete whitewash of a stinking heap of evidence of a scandal that is bigger than Watergate, post a comment and explain why.

Tags: Inspector General Report whitewash, documented FBI corruption, FBI coverup bigger than Watergate, convene a Grand Jury now for FBI SpyGate, IGReport, Journalists bribed FBI, MSM bribed FBI, NY Times rededicates to honesty, NY Times rededication to honest journalism